Embed Notice

@inthehands Maybe one of the positive side effects of recent EU regulations on software liability will be to have these communications and make the context clear to everyone, between "this software is provided AS-IS with no warrany whatsoever" and "this software is part of a critical supply chain" so that the ecosystem of the latter is likely to set up the Foundation and related income stream for the primary maintainers, because the downstream who incorporates the software into their product is liable in the first case, but if they pay the Foundation they can shift liability to that, and in doing so provide the Foundation the resources it needs to be a steward of the software. Neat trick, if it works.