little bit of an effort post, but it reminds me of the joos, and dread (redundant). I took this econ history class once and we were discussing the black death and how based on who died, in terms of the labor market, augmented the response to dealing with it. Essentially, it because economically viable to implement slavery in eastern europe because the marginal cost of owning a slave was lower than the cost of paying a wage, where the opposite was true in the west.

The point is that "pschopath" isn't a legitimate response. It's the last gasp of a fool who has nowhere else to run. As if the only possible answer is that you have some sort of mental defect, and it's almost always thrown by the person who is entirely at fault. The reality is that people make rational decisions when they are pushed to extremes, generally because they had the tolerance to survive getting pushed there. Hitler didn't gas all jews because he got a clipped coin back in change from a coffee in Vienna. He didn't holocaust a race because someone took his foreskin. Of course, we know he didn't "holocaust" anyone, but he did deport them to camps because he finally couldn't tolerate their troublemaking any longer.

As it is with Dread. I don't hate him because of his gay ass avatar, or because he likes cape-shit movies. I actually like some of those cape-shit movies. No, our reasons for hating him are highly developed and honed from years of exposure to his bullshit.

In summary, we should enslave this nigger.