@davidrevoy @ms_zwiebel @creativecommons There is no need for a proprietary restriction on use like a "NOAI" tag (even though it wouldn't be a bad thing for proprietary LLMs not being able to benefit from the works); https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/programs-must-not-limit-freedom-to-run.html (although it's about software, the freedom to run is similar to the freedom to use).

What would be far more effective would be to license under CC BY-SA 4.0 and enforce the license in the case that the work is used to train an LLM and the copyright information is stripped off and the SA conditions are not met.