Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.tech/objects/f8affa06-d789-4217-8f89-908d96d6ae6a">admin (admin@mastodon.tech)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Nov-2022 23:09:15 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.tech/users/admin" title="admin@mastodon.tech"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/12921-48-20221017134753.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="admin" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">admin</a><div><a href="https://bikeshed.party/objects/26077dfd-f344-414d-98e6-aeff67050410" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/4193" title="feld@bikeshed.party">feld</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p>Good to know, believe me, I’m the biggest fan if <a href="https://lain.com/users/lain">@lain</a>. I operate 2 Pleroma forums besides running your Pleroma OTP at <a href="http://Mastodon.tech">Mastodon.tech</a>. </p><p>Approximately once a week &amp; again today, I send an email to your official email address listed at <a href="http://Pleroma.social">Pleroma.social</a>, “contact@pleroma.social”
I’ve never heard a single reply. Who receives the emails from that address? </p><p>Users on my Pleroma Reddit conclude that they must choose either Akkoma or Rebased due to the time it’s taken for 2.5 to come &amp; fix the bugs. See the screenshot below from r/Pleroma to an observation I agree with:
“What happened to Pleroma? All I noticed was everything broke months ago and patches tapered off.”
My own Pleroma OTP faces the same bugs, I feel like I’m being forced to choose Akkoma or Rebased as I can’t continue apologizing to my users for broken stuff.</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/636822#notice-1027179">In conversation</a><time datetime="2022-11-23T23:09:15+09:00" title="Wednesday, 23-Nov-2022 23:09:15 JST">Wednesday, 23-Nov-2022 23:09:15 JST</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.tech/objects/f8affa06-d789-4217-8f89-908d96d6ae6a" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.tech via ActivityPub">mastodon.tech</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.tech/objects/f8affa06-d789-4217-8f89-908d96d6ae6a">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/367061">Untitled attachment</a></label><br><a href="https://mastodon.tech/media/2d2ef2614526b3cfa5f08ea97047c55f494fdf21e6a8af22e4fc9bb83b91fdad.jpg" rel="external">https://mastodon.tech/media/2d2ef2614526b3cfa5f08ea97047c55f494fdf21e6a8af22e4fc9bb83b91fdad.jpg</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
admin (admin@mastodon.tech)'s status on Wednesday, 23-Nov-2022 23:09:15 JSTadmin
in reply to
- on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ
- feld
Good to know, believe me, I’m the biggest fan if @lain. I operate 2 Pleroma forums besides running your Pleroma OTP at Mastodon.tech.
Approximately once a week & again today, I send an email to your official email address listed at Pleroma.social, “contact@pleroma.social” I’ve never heard a single reply. Who receives the emails from that address?
Users on my Pleroma Reddit conclude that they must choose either Akkoma or Rebased due to the time it’s taken for 2.5 to come & fix the bugs. See the screenshot below from r/Pleroma to an observation I agree with: “What happened to Pleroma? All I noticed was everything broke months ago and patches tapered off.” My own Pleroma OTP faces the same bugs, I feel like I’m being forced to choose Akkoma or Rebased as I can’t continue apologizing to my users for broken stuff.
In conversationWednesday, 23-Nov-2022 23:09:15 JST from mastodon.techpermalink
Attachments
1. Untitled attachment
  https://mastodon.tech/media/2d2ef2614526b3cfa5f08ea97047c55f494fdf21e6a8af22e4fc9bb83b91fdad.jpg

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice