Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://wandering.shop/users/cstross/statuses/114653607245313170">Charlie Stross (cstross@wandering.shop)'s status on Monday, 09-Jun-2025 23:12:15 JST</a><a href="https://wandering.shop/@cstross" title="cstross@wandering.shop"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/35284-48-20230405092346.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Charlie Stross" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Charlie Stross</a><div><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p>Reminder that we don't have ANY viable power-producing fusion reactors yet, let alone aneutronic reactors capable of using 3He as fuel: and if you can overcome the coulomb barrier to use 3He as fuel you're 90% of the way to using Boron-11 as fuel, WHICH IS READILY AVAILABLE (AND CHEAP!) HERE ON EARTH. </p><p>There's no need to strip mine the moon for fuel.</p><p>Lunar 3HE mining IS A SCAM DESIGNED TO EXTRACT MONEY FROM INVESTORS. Always has been. Always will be.</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/@arstechnica">@arstechnica</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/@arstechnica/114653548336608142" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://mastodon.social/@arstechnica/114653548336608142</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/5173120#notice-10147621">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-06-09T23:12:15+09:00" title="Monday, 09-Jun-2025 23:12:15 JST">about 18 days ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://wandering.shop/@cstross/114653607245313170" rel="external" title="Sent from wandering.shop via ActivityPub">wandering.shop</a></span></span><a href="https://wandering.shop/@cstross/114653607245313170">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: files.mastodon.social</div><h5><a href="https://mastodon.social/@arstechnica/114653548336608142">Ars Technica (@arstechnica@mastodon.social)</a></h5><div> from <span>Ars Technica</span></div></header><div>Attached: 1 imageA long-shot plan to mine the Moon comes a little closer to reality
To make this plan a reality, Interlune needs larger lunar landers to come online.
https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/06/a-long-shot-plan-to-mine-the-moon-comes-a-little-closer-to-reality/?utm_brand=arstechnica&amp;utm_social-type=owned&amp;utm_source=mastodon&amp;utm_medium=social</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Charlie Stross (cstross@wandering.shop)'s status on Monday, 09-Jun-2025 23:12:15 JSTCharlie Stross
- Ars Technica
Reminder that we don't have ANY viable power-producing fusion reactors yet, let alone aneutronic reactors capable of using 3He as fuel: and if you can overcome the coulomb barrier to use 3He as fuel you're 90% of the way to using Boron-11 as fuel, WHICH IS READILY AVAILABLE (AND CHEAP!) HERE ON EARTH.
There's no need to strip mine the moon for fuel.
Lunar 3HE mining IS A SCAM DESIGNED TO EXTRACT MONEY FROM INVESTORS. Always has been. Always will be.
@arstechnica https://mastodon.social/@arstechnica/114653548336608142
In conversationabout 18 days ago from wandering.shoppermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: files.mastodon.social
  Ars Technica (@arstechnica@mastodon.social)
  from Ars Technica
  Attached: 1 image A long-shot plan to mine the Moon comes a little closer to reality To make this plan a reality, Interlune needs larger lunar landers to come online. https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/06/a-long-shot-plan-to-mine-the-moon-comes-a-little-closer-to-reality/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice