OK so
I'm struggling with this week due to many issues that feel to me artificial. I don't like how this spec is written. I don't like a lot of the decisions
Buuut *sigh*
I guess I got the Good Idea out of the wasm spec I was hoping to find when I picked it. I was feeling like this S-expression form didn't "feel like" a LISP. And then I found this bit in the PDF spec. Using a syntax reordering trick to represent a Forth in LISP style. That's *saying this as if miserable* really smart actually