Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Sexy Moon (moon@shitposter.club)'s status on Friday, 30-Dec-2022 11:47:25 JST Sexy Moon
@selzero @niclas > Taking the same legal side as Disney - lainy likes this.
-
Embed this notice
Deniz Opal (selzero@vmst.io)'s status on Friday, 30-Dec-2022 11:47:26 JST Deniz Opal
@niclas the point is Disney will win.
The artists are banking on it.
The AI model providers TOS states "you own the output".
They are putting the model providers into the firing line.
-
Embed this notice
Niclas Hedhman (niclas@angrytoday.com)'s status on Friday, 30-Dec-2022 11:47:27 JST Niclas Hedhman
@selzero That the rendering is infringement on Disney/s IP rights.
People have lost quite obvious "fair use" cases against Disney, probably the strongest iron fist enforcer of IP out there. And IF Disney would lose in court, they will get Congress to change the laws, just like they have done several times before.
-
Embed this notice
Deniz Opal (selzero@vmst.io)'s status on Friday, 30-Dec-2022 11:47:28 JST Deniz Opal
@niclas losing what?
-
Embed this notice
Niclas Hedhman (niclas@angrytoday.com)'s status on Friday, 30-Dec-2022 11:47:30 JST Niclas Hedhman
@selzero Want to bet your neck on Disney/Marvel/et al losing in court?
-
Embed this notice
Deniz Opal (selzero@vmst.io)'s status on Friday, 30-Dec-2022 11:47:31 JST Deniz Opal
Well this has come to a head. In order to protest AI image generators stealing artists work to train AI models, the artists are deliberately generating AI art based on the IP of corporations that are most sensitive to protecting it.
Who knew the first AI battles would be fought by artists?
Alt text: pictures contain images of AI generated images of Disney, Nintendo, DC, and Marvel characters.