Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   unsafe { Sir Alecks Gates } (agates@activitypub.agates.io)'s status on Friday, 23-Dec-2022 09:07:36 JST unsafe { Sir Alecks Gates }

   • Alex Gleason
   @alex Are you aware of any particular reason Pleroma doesn't implement the replies collection on AP objects? And does Rebased implement it?
   
   My attempts to add it to Pleroma are somewhat successful, although the object cache goes stales with new replies.
   • Embed this notice
     Alex Gleason (alex@gleasonator.com)'s status on Friday, 23-Dec-2022 09:07:14 JST Alex Gleason

     in reply to

     @agates I wasn’t aware of that. We check inReplyTo to fetch ancestors. I guess going the other direction might have performance implications.

   • Embed this notice
     Alex Gleason (alex@gleasonator.com)'s status on Friday, 23-Dec-2022 09:27:46 JST Alex Gleason

     in reply to

     @agates If you have a mostly-working implementation you should submit an MR to Rebased. I’m not opposed to exposing it.

   • Embed this notice
     unsafe { Sir Alecks Gates } (agates@activitypub.agates.io)'s status on Friday, 23-Dec-2022 09:27:48 JST unsafe { Sir Alecks Gates }

     in reply to

     • Alex Gleason
     @alex The main implication is when podcast clients query the ID with "Accept: application/activity+json", they have to fall back to the mastodon API for anything that doesn't implement the replies collection, causing more requests to happen anyway.