Given the previous poast, we may want to take the following into that context:
The d*fense c*ntractor Deagle, in 2017, famously put out a forecast (which eventually gets scrubbed) that by 2025 the population of the US alone would be down to 100million... from 327million by 2025.
Of note - Deagle, isn't some schizo outfit - most of .gov/.mil/glowniggery is subscribed to their feeds.
@blaaablaaaa Have a deep, deep distrust of libertarians; from my understanding he functions as a gatekeeper on issues many of us here consider "important".
Team Dr. Judy Wood here.
Jokes, aside - The original Deagle forecast had everyone believing that natural disaster was imminent, given all the glownigger preparations up to 2012 (especially in AZ and CO in the US). However, given the "turning off" of Cumbre Vieja in the Canaries, and the "world jumping" of CERN - these outcomes might have been avoided.
Am not a believer in shots=depopulation, but the desire to successfully integrate the tech/synthbio into the human population of "The Great Babylon" would negate concern for those whose biology rejects the integration - even to genocidal-levels.
This is one thing I don't agree with corbett on, he brushed it off because he claimed they didn't get some other predictions correct and therefore this should be discounted. From what I've seen they've addressed it at least once or twice and stuck by their decision, granted their reason is people will be moving en masse from these countries to other areas, but I don't think the math actually supports that. Coincidentally, the countries with the largest drops in population have higher rates of boosters.