Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Puniko ? (puniko@mk.absturztau.be)'s status on Friday, 25-Nov-2022 15:03:32 JST Puniko ?

   is it even intentional, that fediverse.observer gives negative scores?
   
   RE: https://mk.absturztau.be/notes/97znqq8677

   • Embed this notice
     Puniko ? (puniko@mk.absturztau.be)'s status on Friday, 25-Nov-2022 16:30:06 JST Puniko ?

     in reply to

     • siina :gentowo:

     @siina@fedi.criminallycute.fi why tho?

   • Embed this notice
     siina :gentowo: (siina@fedi.criminallycute.fi)'s status on Friday, 25-Nov-2022 16:30:07 JST siina :gentowo:

     in reply to
     @puniko Yeah, it's entirely intentional.
   • Embed this notice
     Puniko ? (puniko@mk.absturztau.be)'s status on Friday, 25-Nov-2022 16:33:31 JST Puniko ?

     in reply to

     • siina :gentowo:

     @siina@fedi.criminallycute.fi if the minimum score is -99, kinda odd that my instance has -130 or so :woozy_ai:

   • Embed this notice
     siina :gentowo: (siina@fedi.criminallycute.fi)'s status on Friday, 25-Nov-2022 16:33:33 JST siina :gentowo:

     in reply to
     @puniko I would not know the answer to that. I just know in their example /.env file it has suggested of minimum score being -99. Reading through their source, it looks like it's possible because it subtracts 1-2 points per item they believe is negative.
     
     Additionally, it looks like there's a score and a weighted score ?
   • Embed this notice
     siina :gentowo: (siina@fedi.criminallycute.fi)'s status on Friday, 25-Nov-2022 16:35:09 JST siina :gentowo:

     in reply to
     @puniko I mean, that's the suggested, not whatever they're running on production I think.
     
     Looks like if the score goes low enough for long enough, it gets removed from the list entirely.
     Puniko ? likes this.