For Unbreaking this week, I had to read the 9th Circuit appeal in Queerdoc v DOJ, in which Judge Carlos Bea allows the subpoena against the trans healthcare provider to continue on procedural grounds.
He argues that ending gender-affirming care is not inherently an "improper policy objective", and characterizes it as an "ongoing debate among experts", citing Skrmetti.
Anyway, I had to pay for it via PACER, so you can have it too, if you want.
https://evhaste.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/gov.uscourts.wawd_.350058.31.0.pdf