GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    clacke (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Monday, 24-Aug-2026 21:35:15 JST clacke clacke

    I spoke to a guy the other week who casually mentioned that sure, most Indonesians are Muslim, but he's Chinese Indonesian, so his family is Catholic.

    I would have loved to go further down this conversation branch, but that's not where we went.

    According to him there are Buddhist Chinese Indonesians too, but at least in the Jakarta area, the Catholics seem more common.

    In conversation about a month ago from libranet.de permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Doug Whitfield [Minneapolis] (musicman@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 24-Aug-2026 21:38:33 JST Doug Whitfield [Minneapolis] Doug Whitfield [Minneapolis]
      in reply to

      @clacke are there Chinese Indonesia Punks?

      In conversation about a month ago permalink
      clacke likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Bandar Baru (bandarbaru_1@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 30-Aug-2026 05:28:34 JST Bandar Baru Bandar Baru
      in reply to

      @clacke So, first of all, Indonesia itself linking religion norms/law into their legal law, based on the first point of Indonesian foundational philosophy, called Pancasila: "Belief in the One and Only God".
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancasila

      If people is about to go to marry (for same-religion marriage), they just doing some of administration paperwork to Religious Affairs Office (Kantor Urusan Agama - KUA), & follow all procedures there, to make their marriage are legally recognised & protected by law.

      In conversation about a month ago permalink

      Attachments


      clacke likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      clacke (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Sunday, 30-Aug-2026 05:28:35 JST clacke clacke
      in reply to
      • Bandar Baru

      @bandarbaru_1 Thank you, I am so interested in learning more about Indonesia, directly from people who live there.

      Could there also be difficulty with the administration if a marriage is between two people of different registered religion? Does the religion have legal scope in terms of how the marriage works and what rights and responsibilities it creates?

      In conversation about a month ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Bandar Baru (bandarbaru_1@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 30-Aug-2026 05:28:36 JST Bandar Baru Bandar Baru
      in reply to

      @clacke Yes, there are some disadvantages if the religion section are blank, especially if the administration is relating with religion, such as marriages. Not to count, in some places, that section may be required to fill.

      In conversation about a month ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      clacke (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Sunday, 30-Aug-2026 05:28:37 JST clacke clacke
      in reply to
      Although the government has restored Confucianism's status as a recognized religion, many local authorities do not abide by it and have refused to allow ethnic Chinese from listing it as a religion on their identity cards. Local officials remained largely unaware that the civil registration law legally allowed citizens to leave the religion section on their identity cards blank.

      If your local official follows the rules, you don't have to display one of six approved religions on your ID card.

      Is there a structural disadvantage to going blank? Would you miss out on some benefits or quotas? Would your community frown upon it?

      In conversation about a month ago permalink

      Attachments


    • Embed this notice
      clacke (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Sunday, 30-Aug-2026 05:28:38 JST clacke clacke
      in reply to
      The first wave of conversions occurred in the 1950s and 1960s, and the number of ethnic Chinese Christians during this period quadrupled. The second wave followed after the government withdrew Confucianism's status as a recognized religion in the 1970s. Suharto endorsed a systematic campaign of eradication of Confucianism. As the result, many Chinese in Jakarta and other parts in Java island are mostly Christian, meanwhile in non-Java cities like Medan, Pontianak and other parts in Sumatra and Borneo island are mainly adherents to Buddhism, and some of them still practising Taoism, Confucianism and other Traditional Chinese belief.

      There's the confirmation of the anecdote.

      In conversation about a month ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      clacke (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Sunday, 30-Aug-2026 05:28:39 JST clacke clacke
      in reply to
      The Ministry of Religious Affairs grants official status to six religions: Islam, Protestantism, Catholicism, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Confucianism. A 2006 civil registration law does not allow Indonesians to identify themselves as a member of any other religion on their identity cards.

      ... you list your religion on your identity card. 🤯

      According to an analysis of the 2000 census data, about half of Chinese Indonesians were Buddhists, and about one-third Protestant or Catholic.
      In conversation about a month ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      clacke (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Sunday, 30-Aug-2026 05:28:41 JST clacke clacke
      in reply to

      It's difficult to find this kind of demographical matrix of ethnicity and religion, and Indonesia itself doesn't track ethnicity in its census.

      The Wikipedia page on Chinese Indonesians says:


      Religion
      Predominantly:
      Buddhism, Christianity, Confucianism

      Minority:
      Taoism, Islam, Hinduism, and others

      In conversation about a month ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Bandar Baru (bandarbaru_1@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 30-Aug-2026 05:28:55 JST Bandar Baru Bandar Baru
      in reply to

      @clacke And the cross religion marriage in Indonesia currently can't be administered legally.
      https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/nikah-beda-agama-cl290/

      Apparently, cross religion marriage was allowed, but in some conditions, including if one of them are ignoring the religion norm. But now, seems the chance of it has been closed. As from government perspective, cross religion marriage may also invalid from the religion perspective too.

      If religion perspective invalid = invalid by legal law too.

      In conversation about a month ago permalink

      Attachments


      clacke likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Bandar Baru (bandarbaru_1@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 30-Aug-2026 05:28:57 JST Bandar Baru Bandar Baru
      in reply to

      @clacke So, for people who just wanna to being atheist or agnostic, de jure, they must stated what their religion on their ID card. But de facto, they can do whatever they want, without being tied or practising with the religion law/norm they stated on their ID card, as long as whatever they did isn't break or violating with the general legal law.

      Non-religion behavior such as atheist or agnostic, are not legally recognised, as its incompatible with Pancasila.

      In conversation about a month ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Bandar Baru (bandarbaru_1@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 30-Aug-2026 05:28:57 JST Bandar Baru Bandar Baru
      in reply to

      @clacke Yep, as Indonesian, living in Indonesia, single never married, not have a legal background, and have religion, I also just learn about this too, tbh 😅

      I read your question, browsing some resources a little bit, as most resources are indeed in Indonesian, and I try to understanding from what I read, so I might be wrong or biased at some point 😅

      But hopefully (from me), the overview about this topic that I just talk about it, its still relevant with the factual condition.

      In conversation about a month ago permalink
      clacke likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Bandar Baru (bandarbaru_1@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 30-Aug-2026 05:28:58 JST Bandar Baru Bandar Baru
      in reply to

      @clacke This is also the reason of why, LGBT rights is also not legally recognised by Indonesian legal law.

      De jure, isn't legally recognized. But de facto, some peoples may tolerating about it, as previously there are less legal persecution if people practicing LGBT.

      Until recently Prabowo regime recognised it as non-military threat. That recognition causing some of backlash & controversies too, make the queer more vulnerable from public persecution.
      https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/c5yzzpjjrklo

      In conversation about a month ago permalink

      Attachments


      1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: ichef.bbci.co.uk
        Perpres Pertahanan Negara yang menyebut LGBTQ sebagai ancaman dinilai bermasalah - BBC News Indonesia
        from https://www.facebook.com/bbcnews
        Peraturan presiden (perpres) yang memasukkan Lesbian, Gay, Biseksual, Transgender dan Queer (LGBTQ) sebagai ancaman negara nonmiliter tiba-tiba menjadi pemberitaan media arus utama. Pelabelan ini berpotensi memperkuat stigma, persekusi, sekaligus menjadi instrumen politik pengalihan isu, kata aktivis minoritas gender dan seksual.
    • Embed this notice
      Bandar Baru (bandarbaru_1@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 30-Aug-2026 05:28:58 JST Bandar Baru Bandar Baru
      in reply to

      @clacke There are some effort for some peoples to legally petition for the removal of the religion column on ID card. But this was rejected by Constitutional Court.
      https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/permohonan-penghapusan-kolom-agama-di-ktp-kandas-di-mk-lt677b595579c2f/?page=all

      Again, from the court perspective, the concept of religion and religion freedom here is always based, follows, and inseparable from the Pancasila, especially of the first point.

      In conversation about a month ago permalink

      Attachments


    • Embed this notice
      clacke (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Sunday, 30-Aug-2026 06:46:43 JST clacke clacke
      in reply to
      • Bandar Baru

      @bandarbaru_1 Thank you, much appreciated. I'm learning a lot from your comments.

      I read the Pancasila article. It's a really interesting topic and a thorough article too.

      The principles are beautiful, and I really appreciate that Indonesia has something like that in its founding document. It has some parallels to Dr. Sun's philosophy for the Chinese nation a few decades earlier.

      In conversation about a month ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      clacke (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Sunday, 30-Aug-2026 06:46:49 JST clacke clacke
      in reply to

      Then there is of course the matter of how the principles are interpreted and applied, and that's always the tricky part, isn't it. It's interesting to me how Sukarno, Suharto and the movements in the modern era all draw on the same text for legitimacy, while their concrete direction for the nation may be very different.

      Again, it's not entirely unlike how both the PRC and the ROC refer to Dr. Sun as their founding father.

      Indonesian Guided Democracy and Chinese Political Tutelage sound like echoes of each other as well.

      In conversation about a month ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      clacke (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Sunday, 30-Aug-2026 07:57:14 JST clacke clacke
      in reply to
      • Bandar Baru

      I often think of these things, and when I think of how a society could be built, I often end up telling myself "now you're just trying to build Hong Kong again", or Singapore, or Sweden, or the US, and now I can see that Indonesia tried many different ideas as well, some of which I have tried myself in my head. It's always harder out there, with real people.

      Self-determination, justice and nation-building were difficult 300 years ago, they were difficult 100 years ago, and they're difficult today. So many ideas have been tried, partially worked, partially failed, and there is still no magic formula. Humanity needs to keep trying, each community in their own circumstances.

      @bandarbaru_1

      In conversation about a month ago permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.