Public
- Public
- Network
- Groups
- Featured
- Popular
- People

Conversation

Notices

Embed this notice
David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*) (david_chisnall@infosec.exchange)'s status on Saturday, 18-Jul-2026 01:57:43 JST David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)

RE: https://mastodon.acm.org/@ACM/116929782094395296
My short (submitted) feedback on this:
I have stopped reviewing for all ACM publications because of the overwhelming number of plausible-looking papers generated by LLMs where I cannot trust that the results are actually related to having run an experiment. LLMs are destroying the integrity of science conducted by ACM members. The ACM should in no way be encouraging this behaviour.
All of my ACM publications (and I am the author of one of the eight most-downloaded papers in the ACM digital library) are released with a license that requires attribution. LLMs are incapable of guaranteeing attribution with their output. As a result, I regard any training of LLMs on my papers as copyright infringement.
In conversation about 2 months ago from infosec.exchange permalink
Attachments
1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
  
  Assn for Computing Machinery (@ACM@mastodon.acm.org)
  
  from Assn for Computing Machinery
  
  If you would like to share your thoughts, please use this link (https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeq7MFM7TlSXIaIXQnIltiQeWE_w3cl36HFPwql4S7u-drmzg/viewform). ACM leadership will take your feedback into account while we develop and implement our AI content strategy over the coming months.

Feeds