Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
There are guy acquaintances who would have been solid guys-- even friends. They are willing to offer a hand, can joke (obvious exceptions), healthy and booksmart.
Married, just trying to live well.
But they hold as their core identity a Boy Scoutish, Supermanish, reddit lens. They--when no one else is around--no women to impress, no camera watching--bring up as a topic how oppressed and in need of defense trannies are (if tangential to some topic).
They would have been the stalwart defenders of the good. The first to speak up. Willing and able to act. Strong, vigilant. They want something to defend.
They are corrupted.
-
Embed this notice
I don't know what this means...
> Boy Scoutish, Supermanish, reddit lens
-
Embed this notice
i have never in my life. you know people like this?
-
Embed this notice
I still don't know what it means... boy scoutish and supermanish seem contradictory.
-
Embed this notice
i meant the defending trannies part. Those poor trannies.
-
Embed this notice
I dunno. I've always thought boyscouts were closet fags. 😏
-
Embed this notice
>boy scoutish and supermanish
What I'm thinking is this:
"A Scout is trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly..." (Boy Scout)
and
"I stand for Truth, Justice, and the American Way." (Superman)
Someone standing with chin up, chest out.
They're charistmatic, want to be involved in doing good and act on it, not shy about helping. Clean cut, fit, into hands-on hobbies. Married. What I'm getting at is they are without many of the libshit male failings.
Instead of being defenders/practicioners of those "Boy Scout / Superman" ideals for their own people, they are Boy Scouts and Supermen for "the most marginalized" (ex. trannies).
I don't see this type of guy a lot. I know of maybe 3 irl. They would be the defenders, a wall of virtue and calm for their family and friends. And they are--but for grotesque versions of the ideals. They're me, if I were retarded.