Free software people: A major goal of free software is for individuals to be able to cause software to behave in the way they want it to
LLMs: (enable that)
Free software people: Oh no not like that
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Matthew Garrett (mjg59@nondeterministic.computer)'s status on Sunday, 19-Apr-2026 03:16:07 JST
Matthew Garrett
-
Embed this notice
Evan Prodromou (evan@cosocial.ca)'s status on Sunday, 19-Apr-2026 03:16:04 JST
Evan Prodromou
-
Embed this notice
Matthew Garrett (mjg59@nondeterministic.computer)'s status on Sunday, 19-Apr-2026 03:16:05 JST
Matthew Garrett
@radex See I fundamentally don't believe that code should be copyrightable and also me 30 years ago did not produce code that was suitable for professional use but it fixed my problems anyway
-
Embed this notice
Radek Pietruszewski (radex@social.hackerspace.pl)'s status on Sunday, 19-Apr-2026 03:16:07 JST
Radek Pietruszewski
@mjg59 This doesn't feel right to me. IMO few people actually object to use of LLMs by individuals for tinkering on personal stuff.
The criticism as I see it is primarily that:
1) there are huge societal/political impacts - uncompensated use of copyrighted material; benefits of it accruing primarily to a few big players; energy use; layoffs; perceived misallocation of massive amounts of capital
2) the output quality of LLMs is t r a s h, unsuitable for professional use -
Embed this notice
翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Monday, 20-Apr-2026 20:25:23 JST
翠星石
@mjg59 >cause software to behave in the way they want it to
>LLM
Um, LLM's can copy and slopify a lot of code, but it's a gamble every time whether it doesn't copy what you want, or copies what you want, but due to the lack of understanding includes subtle bug(s) that will bite you later.
-
Embed this notice