Conversation

In a rare public criticism of a fellow member of the Supreme Court,
Justice Sonia Sotomayor criticized Justice Brett Kavanaugh
for his justification of racial profiling
in immigration-based stops of U.S. citizens.

“I had a colleague in that case who wrote, you know, these are only temporary stops,”
Sotomayor said at a University of Kansas School of Law event on Tuesday.

She was referring to the case of
"Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo",
in which Kavanaugh wrote an opinion framed as a concurrence to the unsigned majority ruling.

“This is from a man whose parents were professionals. And probably doesn’t really know any person who works by the hour.”

“Those hours that they took you away, nobody’s paying that person,”
she added.

“And that makes a difference between a meal for him and his kids that night and maybe just cold supper.”

In his concurrence, Kavanaugh said that race or ethnicity can be a “relevant factor” when combined with other factors
like “day labor, landscaping, agriculture, and construction”
or speaking Spanish instead of English.

He added that the burden of racial profiling on citizens or legal non-citizens would be minimal.

“If the person is a U. S. citizen or otherwise lawfully in the United States, that individual will be free to go after the brief encounter,” Kavanaugh wrote.

“Only if the person is illegally in the United States may the stop lead to further immigration proceedings.”

As Sotomayor’s critique shows, these encounters are anything but brief or friendly.

Citizens profiled by immigration agents have been manhandled, hit, zip-tied, kidnapped off the street and held for days in detention,
-- sometimes without access to a lawyer.

Agents also routinely refused to accept documents proving their citizenship.

Citizens who have been detained include at least 20 children.

These encounters have come to be known as
“Kavanaugh Stops,”
after the justice’s concurrence authorizing them.

In her dissent in
"Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo" Sotomayor criticized Kavanaugh’s concurrence as

“all but declared that all Latinos, U. S. citizens or not, who work low wage jobs are fair game to be seized at any time,
taken away from work,
and held until they provide proof of their legal status to the agents’ satisfaction.”

Kavanaugh’s insistence that these stops would be just a “brief encounter” for citizens “blinks reality,” Sotomayor wrote.

“Two plaintiffs in this very case tried to explain that they are U. S. citizens;

one was then pushed against a fence with his arms twisted behind his back,
and the other was taken.”

Despite Kavanaugh’s concurrence seemingly authorizing these Kavanaugh Stops,
the Supreme Court has not officially ruled on the use of racial profiling in roving mass deportation operations.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/sonia-sotomayor-brett-kavanaugh-racial-profiling-immigration_n_69d6ae34e4b0ccb589eaa377

Public

Notices

Feeds