Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Sunday, 08-Mar-2026 02:18:58 JST silverpill

   FEP website now displays the number of implementations for each implementable proposal:

   https://fediverse.codeberg.page/fep/final/

   These numbers are based on the information that authors provide in the "Implementations" section of a proposal.

   By default, proposals are informational, so authors need to opt in by adding type: implementation to the metadata block.

   #fep #fedidev

   • Embed this notice
     silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Sunday, 08-Mar-2026 03:06:38 JST silverpill

     in reply to

     • Julian Fietkau

     @julian The site was built by @helge, I also contribute to this project from time to time.

     Yes, authors are responsible for maintaining implementation lists, but FEP process is meant to be collaborative and others can add missing implementations by opening a PR.

   • Embed this notice
     Julian Fietkau (julian@fietkau.social)'s status on Sunday, 08-Mar-2026 03:06:40 JST Julian Fietkau

     in reply to

     @silverpill Is that your work? Thanks!

     Still, it makes me think even more that we should have some sort of software project × FEP matrix for implementation status info that's more easily editable by anyone (wiki-style?) and not solely reliant on the FEP authors keeping the implementation list up to date. Something like https://correct.webfinger-canary.fietkau.software/#implementation-status but collaborative.

   • Embed this notice
     silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Sunday, 08-Mar-2026 03:56:35 JST silverpill

     in reply to

     • Julian Fietkau

     @julian Yes, just open a PR. It will be merged by a facilitator, but only if the author approves. Here's how it looks like: https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/pulls/758

     @helge

   • Embed this notice
     Julian Fietkau (julian@fietkau.social)'s status on Sunday, 08-Mar-2026 03:56:37 JST Julian Fietkau

     in reply to

     @silverpill @helge I couldn't find any explicit guidance for external contributions in FEP-a4ed. So the expected process would be to simply open a PR? Would that be merged by the respective FEP author or by a repository facilitator?

     As you might know, I've been documenting FEP-044f implementations in Bridgy Fed's GitHub issue about that FEP, but I've been hesitant to dump reviewing/merging work on the sole author of FEP-044f just to “upstream” the information.