Maybe we should establish a "maintenance.md" practice just like "readme.md" or "LICENSE" where you just clearly outline the amount of maintenance the project/development team are planning to put into the code base and under which conditions.
I have seen that a few times but maybe it should be more of a standard.
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
tante (tante@tldr.nettime.org)'s status on Monday, 16-Feb-2026 01:26:30 JST
tante
- GreenSkyOverMe (Monika) and Tim Chambers repeated this.
-
Embed this notice
tante (tante@tldr.nettime.org)'s status on Monday, 16-Feb-2026 01:26:56 JST
tante
"I will not maintain this code at all. Use fully at your own risk" is valid.
I think it's just important to make that clear.
In conversation permalink -
Embed this notice
Jens Bannmann (tynstar@nerdculture.de)'s status on Monday, 23-Feb-2026 05:25:38 JST
Jens Bannmann
@tante
A while back I found an essay titled "Healthy expectations in open source" by @donmccurdy that proposes just such a standard:
https://www.donmccurdy.com/2023/07/03/expectations-in-open-source/I found the classifications well thought out and have started to use it for my own small projects.
This was the accompanying Fediverse post: https://fosstodon.org/@donmccurdy/110662029314944366
In conversation permalink Attachments