I find it interesting that there's loads of people who made a core part of their identity campaigning against trans men being in women's spaces and how it impacts women, who have gone completely silent about Grok being used to undress and brutalise women.
If you're wondering what consequences X has faced: none. At all. A few months ago when Grok called itself MechaHitler, the service was shut entirely for days, the same day. When this happened, Elon laughed.
Grok is still outputting non-consensual deepfake pornography and sexual abuse material at a rate of 1 post per second. Example search:
@GossiTheDog are you talking about the bikini photos, or what? anytime I've tried searching for what you're saying it just shows a bunch of asians in bikinis even the 'adult content' hidden ones aren't nude. I'm not looking for "teh nudes" I'm just wondering like what you are seeing that qualifies as 'deepfake pornography'
Wired has a look at videos created on Grok. Includes knives being inserted into vaginas, “very young” people having sex. Around 10% are CSAM and still online. xAI declined to comment.
The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) says its analysts have discovered "criminal imagery" of girls aged between 11 and 13 which "appears to have been created" using Grok. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg1mzlryxeo
@GossiTheDog when i worked trust and safety for two social media companies that shit would instantly get IP banned and a law enforcement referral . and even as an anarchist i wopuld feel 0% conflicted about it.
It looks like the threat of X being banned in the UK worked - Grok has been limited to paid users. Take your crying with laughter emojis and stick them up your arse, Elon. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
The UK government says the move by X to limit Grok to paid users is “insulting” and basically monetising abuse, and they would support a ban of X in the UK if recommended by the regulator. They’ve asked the regulator for recommendations in days. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c99kn52nx9do
@GossiTheDog why, if “all party leaders commented” did the BBC only quote the Prime Minister (fair enough) and Farage, rather than, say, the Conservative Party leader? Or anyone else?
Is the BBC biased to giving more exposure to Reform than it deserves? From here, it kinda looks like it. Why? Who is pushing the BBC to do this?
So now that Grok is keeping Deepfakes behind a paywall, when are they going after Gemini and ChatGPT, who when presented with the right prompt will gladly undress a uploaded photo, except for free.
The international laws against deepfakes will have to be made first and force any AI to stop doing it.
Because right now, Gen AI can also be ran locally, and easily without any restriction.
You can't win this with just hating on Elon Musk. There's so much more to this.
Also, you can still undress women on Grok withy the free account. It's all just a hate campaign against Elon Musk because he's a public figure people hate.
Who is the public figure of Google/Gemini. If there even is any.
But nobody cares about "the poor women who get undressed".
It's just "I have leverage to hate on Musk now" under the guise of sexual abuse.
Children is a scary topic, I agree, Gemini and especially ChatGPT will know when a minor is involved and say that it's a minor. Good job, Grok indeed, will change a child into a bikini.
They still do btw. Except apparantly it's "behind a paywall"
That doesn't mean my reply is "bollocks". Gen AI everywhere still needs to stop allowing deepfakes and at least of sexual or provocative nature.
Some Grok users, mostly men, began to demand to see bruising on the bodies of the women, and for blood to be added to the images. Requests to show women tied up and gagged were instantly granted.
I asked Cisco why it is directly funding an AI tool being used to non-consensual undress and brutalise women and children, having this week invested in xAI. They replied No comment.
I have a list of other cybersecurity providers invested in xAI, I am working my way through those and plan to feature the key staff members involved in a write up.
The UK government is to enforce a law this week which will make it a criminal offence to supply tools designed to create non-consensual intimate images https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cq845glnvl1o
Saying "we'll fine $18mn or 10% of (revenue/turnover/profit)" is again, one thing - but it has to happen, and if there's only one thing that bloke is, it's that he's an eel.
Pretty sure the executives in the UK will not be entirely quaking in their boots.
Additionally, we've got the US Gov to consider - although kicking their armed and security forces off the island would be an interesting move!
A new YouGov survey shows that the British public overwhelmingly believe AI companies should not be allowed to generate such imagery. Fully 96% of Britons say that firms should not be allowed to generate ‘undressed’ images of children (only 1% say they should), with 87% saying the same regarding such images of adults (5% think this is ok). https://yougov.co.uk/technology/articles/53828-ai-tools-should-not-be-allowed-to-make-undressed-images-say-britons
X has finally climbed down over Grok generating non-consensual undressing, after many of the major regulators got involved.
I’d strongly recommend countries have robust laws and regulation in place for GenAI being used to brutalise women and minorities as ultimately the whole episode shows it’s only external pressure that will hold companies accountable, not self regulation and common sense. X basically tried to monetise incels harassing people.
@GossiTheDog Is it too much to hope for a world where we hold the people responsible, and leave the tools alone? For every nefarious use blocked, an innovation or inspired learner gets snuffed out.
Living in a bounce house world really obstructs the view out.
We don’t need to make large motorized vehicles that can run people over either. Somehow we’ve coalesced on making traffic laws and placing safety measures to mitigate the harm due to the overwhelming benefits.
EU opens formal probe into X over Grok deepfakes. They will be looking at what controls xAI had. Spoiler: you could reply to any woman on X and ask it to remove her clothes, do not many controls. https://www.ft.com/content/f5ed0160-7098-4e63-88e5-8b3f70499b02
Ireland’s data protection watchdog has launched a “large-scale” inquiry into X after reports found millions of non-consensually generated sexually explicit or suggestive content created using Grok AI. X’s European headquarters is situated in Dublin.
Data protection authorities from across the globe have today published a Joint Statement on AI-Generated Imagery.
The statement represents the united position of 61 authorities and has been issued in response to serious concerns about artificial intelligence (AI) systems that generate realistic images and videos depicting identifiable individuals without their knowledge and consent. The signatories are especially concerned about potential harms to children.
xAI have asked a court to strip the anonymity of four people suing it over Grok removing their clothing in images without their consent. One was depicted as a child in the Grok images.
It appears to be an attempt to have them drop the case.
@GossiTheDog "there is nothing inherently stigmatizing about revealing the fact that a deepfake image was created of South Carolina Doe without revealing the image itself"
We know that we can rely on elon's rabid weird nerd stans to handle the stigmatizing for us...
Canada’s privacy commissioner has found “that X Corp and xAI violated Canada’s federal private sector privacy law by launching the Grok AI-powered image generation tool without implementing appropriate safeguards at the outset”.
It produced “millions” of “sexualized deepfakes largely targeting women and children”.