@strypey I don't think either of the cats here have had opinions on data processing, where sonnet at least confirmed there was nothing else for me to learn about the problem.
@strypey when people on fedi actually become helpful they will regain the right to complain about LLMs to me. i gave humans the entire year and they were largely just shitty and useless.
@icedquinn > I don't think either of the cats here have had opinions on data processing
The Trained #MOLE didn't have any opinions on it either. It just regurgitated some words vaguely related to the words you prompted it with. Any opinions involved were your own.
> where sonnet at least confirmed there was nothing else for me to learn about the problem
@Dicey@strypey near the end of my elementary school days people took to ghosting conversations in person. all the adults would lie about how they're kids they'll grow up (they didn't, ghosting has become the norm instead.) i'd start just hitting them and/or other shit when they did it.
Claude seems to be the smartest when it comes to software engineering, but it's not smart enough to tackle complex problems. It's very fast, though. Very fast to produce a solution that doesn't quite solve the problem. Although it always superficially appears to. And definitely claims to.
@strypey@icedquinn anyway, maybe you experienced another internet than me, I don’t know. To me it seems like just slop everything about it. A place where people can get out frustrations about life, release their inner beast, it works well for that. Or their true self. It also works as a place you don’t have to act a role, so that’s a positive. Guess deep down we are actually vicious beasts, like Machiavelli claimed
@Dicey@strypey i asked the bot (claude) about some social stuff today. mostly it was just like "uhh idk go get gig jobs i guess" and i had to reiterate how does one care about doing menial labor when their maslows are critically unmet and it was just like
@strypey pro-social behavior has to be actively managed. even the skinner boxies have started to acknowledge that ("Coaching for Performance" nods to this. just throwing children in a room and saying they'll socialize and there's nothing to be done is a widely held persistent lie.)
we have about 2-3 generations of absentee parents who slept at the wheel the entirety of raising the kids. it's not going to be a good time for any of us.
@icedquinn People behaving worse online than we do in person is definitely a thing. Anyone who thinks people are never dicks in person never experienced school. So the opposite may be a thing in some cases as well.
I think it's worth keeping in mind that social behaviour is as much a function of context as it is personality, cognition or biology. It's an interference pattern between all these things and more.
@strypey the then-therapist was trying to talk me in to it but college busywork took up all of my time to waste trying to socialize.
after that i started to sign up for some events and they put the world in to lockdown.
have since given up on everything but in-person interaction wasn't any less crap than people act online--despite all the copium people have told me over the years that "oh no no that's just the internet."
@strypey@icedquinn usually most people find life itself frustrating. It's not like a Disney movie. For me currently it's pretty good, but that is something that can change in a minute.
@icedquinn > i wouldn't say this space or conversation has been helpful at all
You get no value at all from being in the fediverse? You've been active here for quite a while, so I find that a bit hard to believe.
But you're clearly feeling frustrated or lonely or something, feel free to share whatever that it (using Direct posts if that's more comfortable for you).
@strypey@Dicey not that this has anything remotely to do with anything i was talking about but
> why originally the excuse was "russian disinfo." under the cold war the CIA engaged in project mockingbird--which basically amounts to subverting every source of democratic news to make sure the right biases were enforced. in a congressional hearing the director was asked directly if there was any outlet he hasn't tampered with and the director declined to answer.
the NSA was also tasked with ensuring computer systems were secured against hypothetical soviet attacks. though with the fall of the soviet union they have pivoted to hoarding hacking and blackmail tools more than anything.
Uh-huh. That raises more than a few questions. But let's start with, why? It would be much less effort for spooks to buy Britannica than to keep control of Wikipedia.
Secondly, do you think all Open Source projects are run by spooks too? What about Open Street Map? Appropedia? Open Food Facts? iFixit? Thingiverse? Open Source Ecology? Stack Overflow? BitTorrent?!? There are so many examples of people helping each other online.
@Dicey > maybe you experienced another internet than me
I guess so. I've seen people online helping each other with all manner of practical problems. Giving comfort during difficult times. Organising activities. That's on top of all the large-scale collaboration where people help each other via the commons; Free Code software, Wikipedia, etc, etc.
@Dicey@strypey there is also the infamous quote that our job is complete when everything americans believe is wrong, which has been confirmed by someone who used to work with the man as being something he did say.
@icedquinn@strypey I mean Wikipedia is one of most useful tools the establishment got for narrative control, most people on this part of fedi knows that. It’s useful, because it's referenced to rebute or confirm information. So it goes straight to mind control. Nobody believes the media, but more people are likely to believe Wikipedia. They got shady editors, and people editing articles with superpowers, so their edits are confirmed. Whole thing is a psyop. Not saying you can't find lots useful information, but for politics, its a psyop.