@leonoverweel we should electrify what we can, but this isn’t possible for all the things. We’ll need efuels for example for flying long distances or shipping or several industries.
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Emil Jacobs - Collectifission (collectifission@greennuclear.online)'s status on Sunday, 12-Oct-2025 05:39:31 JST
Emil Jacobs - Collectifission
- kaia likes this.
-
Embed this notice
Leon Overweel (leonoverweel@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 12-Oct-2025 05:39:32 JST
Leon Overweel
@collectifission agreed but not very relevant to my point I think: China is electrifying, not electrolyzing.
-
Embed this notice
Leon Overweel (leonoverweel@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 12-Oct-2025 05:39:33 JST
Leon Overweel
@collectifission luckily this graph is primary energy, so ~2/3rds of it doesn’t need to be replaced at all because it’s just lost due to the inefficiency of burning fossil fuels :)
-
Embed this notice
Emil Jacobs - Collectifission (collectifission@greennuclear.online)'s status on Sunday, 12-Oct-2025 05:39:33 JST
Emil Jacobs - Collectifission
@leonoverweel Don't get me started on the inefficiencies in producing and burning hydrogen 😅
-
Embed this notice
Emil Jacobs - Collectifission (collectifission@greennuclear.online)'s status on Sunday, 12-Oct-2025 05:39:34 JST
Emil Jacobs - Collectifission
50,000 TWh is around 1/4 of all energy we use as a species on this planet. It's on another scale, hard to imagine.
Yes, China had 359 GW of utility scale solar in 2024 and was installing another 277. That's ~1100 TWh annually.
Yes, China is building 150 new gigawatt scale nuclear power plants until 2035, that's another ~1200 TWh.
Yes, China has 521 GW of installed wind turbines, this amounts to another ~1400 TWh.
It all dwarves Western efforts, but amounts to less than 10% of China's energy hunger. So much more is still needed. And this is a moving target as energy consumption is still going up!