Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   white_male (white_male@poa.st)'s status on Sunday, 28-Sep-2025 21:09:10 JST white_male

   • monsignor_dickface
   @monsignor_dickface She has two separate dresses for her tits in that tent? ;D
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Sunday, 28-Sep-2025 21:09:09 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • monsignor_dickface
     It looks like she had special pockets sewn on to hold her flapjacks.
   • Embed this notice
     white_male (white_male@poa.st)'s status on Sunday, 28-Sep-2025 21:21:11 JST white_male

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • monsignor_dickface
     @Humpleupagus @monsignor_dickface Btw, is whistle blowing of abuse by priviledge party a valid excuse to business tort in your jurisdiction?
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Sunday, 28-Sep-2025 21:21:47 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • monsignor_dickface
     https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/civil-code/civ-sect-47/
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Sunday, 28-Sep-2025 21:25:30 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • monsignor_dickface
     The short answer is it depends on the recipient of the communication and/or the context is which it was made. Civil Code 47 governs most communication privileges, except specialized privileges, like attorney-client.
   • Embed this notice
     white_male (white_male@poa.st)'s status on Sunday, 28-Sep-2025 21:27:14 JST white_male

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • monsignor_dickface
     @Humpleupagus @monsignor_dickface Yeah, watching "The Merchant of Venice", brb.
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? likes this.