Here's how it's different: https://phillipjreese.com/the-social-network-that-cant-sell-out-understanding-mastodon-vs-bluesky/
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Dave Lane :flag_tino: 🇳🇿 (lightweight@mastodon.nzoss.nz)'s status on Thursday, 28-Aug-2025 12:07:53 JST
Dave Lane :flag_tino: 🇳🇿
-
Embed this notice
Dave Lane :flag_tino: 🇳🇿 (lightweight@mastodon.nzoss.nz)'s status on Thursday, 28-Aug-2025 12:07:54 JST
Dave Lane :flag_tino: 🇳🇿
Yeah, folks getting locked out of bigtech socials is too bad... https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/571326/musician-pacific-leader-northland-grandmother-dozens-of-kiwis-social-accounts-banned but it's entirely predictable. If your livelihood depends on a 3rd party you don't control, you're a subsidiary to their business, not stand-alone... I explain it here: https://davelane.nz/mshostage - the moral of the story: distribute your risk. Having an credible foothold in the Fediverse is probably a very good idea, even if 'your numbers' are initially underwhelming, because it's *fundamentally* different.
In conversation permalink Attachments
Tim Chambers repeated this.
-
Embed this notice