Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
List of the biggest enemies of the people, feel free to swap the order around, with the exception of 1, it's all part of the same club anyway.
I'll put the absolute number 1 biggest enemy of the people at the end.
・The WEF/UN/WHO/whatever
・Davos/Bilderberg
・New World Order
・SDGs/ESG
・Jews
・Globalism
・Big and alt tech
・Mass media (mainstream and alternative included)
・All ideologies (veganism, communism/soycialism, capitalism, transgenderism, transhumanism, and so on)
・Religion
・The left/right divide
・Authoritarianism
・Soros funded terrorist groups (Antifa, BLM, LGBT+)
・The banks
・Governments and their politicians (yes, all of them, no exceptions)
・Windows
・Trannies
・Doctors and hospitals
・Cops (they're still OK here in Japan though, but expect them to turn against us too at some point)
・Psyops
(Please add if you believe I'm missing something, might update the list later.)
By far the number 1 biggest enemy of the people:
・Your obedience
Because your own obedience is exactly what makes all the above evil in the first place.
-
Embed this notice
@ryo
Umm... what about cryptobros? I think at least the energy wasted for crypto mining just for maintaining the system is evil enough.
-
Embed this notice
@udon They can technically be put under "ideologies".
Supporting crypto over fiat is definitely more liberating, but sadly there's far too much soy among 99% of the cryptobros.
-
Embed this notice
Just like with the internet, cryoto started as a nerd-only thing.
Once the normies got allowed in, estrogen levels started to raise within the community.
-
Embed this notice
@ryo
I don't know if I can firmly say it's a good replacement tbh. The only pros is that some of them like Monero is privacy friendly. But then the possible drawbacks:
1. Compared to fiat the wasted resources is a lot more I think (the physical cost for printing bank notes and coins; for digital money they don't require mining). Just look at the electricity bill and you will know - and wasting resources for nothing (not even virtual products like drawings) but just to keep the system running. This reason alone is enough.
2. Doesn't solve the problem that those already own resources (big corpos what ever) will still stay on top.
3. Crypto still relies on the Internet infrastructure and ISP.
4. In reality they are more unstable than fiat. (I'm not saying fiat is good or stable either and it's a network effect, but that is a risk when not everyone value crypto or computers - and that is a very wrong assumption on those "global universal currency")
-
Embed this notice
@ryo
Here's the contraction. Crypto is useless if say, only you and me use.
-
Embed this notice
@udon
> Compared to fiat the wasted resources is a lot more I think
And physical minting and printing requires lots of metal to be mined and trees to be cut.
Does any environMENTAList even notice this basic fact?
> the physical cost for printing bank notes and coins; for digital money they don't require mining
Yes, CBDCs are going to be just ASSigned to you by presses one somebody else's keyboard.
> Just look at the electricity bill and you will know
You could actually generate free energy using bits of copper, paper, iron, and magnet apparently.
Didn't try it out myself yet though.
But ex-commies from eastern Europe actually confirmed that when they had to start paying for electricity, they attached a magnet to their meter which effectively gave them free energy again.
> Doesn't solve the problem that those already own resources (big corpos what ever) will still stay on top.
Sounds reasonable, although I wonder how that will really go.
> Crypto still relies on the Internet infrastructure and ISP.
Not necessarily.
You can keep most crypto's offline in desktop wallets (only the smart contract ones actually require internet, and smart contracts are a scam anyway).
You'll need the internet to make transactions and sync up with the blockchains however.
> In reality they are more unstable than fiat.
If you view it as a stock, then yes it's very unstable.
If you view it as a currency, not as much.
There are dumbfucks who keep their crypto's on exchanges, and these people are usually the ones who go like "wut? My crypto's are all gone, CRYPTO IS A SCAM!!".
Meanwhile, they get reminded so many times to take these off exchanges, if they'd do that the general image would have been way different.
-
Embed this notice
@udon That I can agree with.
-
Embed this notice
@ryo or in other words it's like my boss browsing coin price charts thinking he'll get rich instead of doing his job
-
Embed this notice
@PhenomX6 Those people are always in for a very rude awakening sooner or later.
-
Embed this notice
@ryo
> And physical minting and printing requires lots of metal to be mined and trees to be cut.
We would need real data to compare. But
1. You can only know how many you consumed indirectly through the numbers on your bill. You cannot build feelings on them and nothing will stop you from mining them (unless you run out of money for the bills). You don't print money but only the elites do and you will never know directly when the resources is used up enough.
2. Physical cost exist on the mining hardware too if you want to argue.
> Does any environMENTAList even notice this basic fact?
Please no straw man. We are not having a race to see who waste more.
> You could actually generate free energy using bits of copper, paper, iron, and magnet apparently.
> Didn't try it out myself yet though.
> But ex-commies from eastern Europe actually confirmed that when they had to start paying for electricity, they attached a magnet to their meter which effectively gave them free energy again.
I don't understand the mechanics very well, is it about electromagnetism? Please share if you have some tutorials. But AFAIK you can't create something or energy out of no where.
> Sounds reasonable, although I wonder how that will really go.
Do you own the super computers? Do you own all the Google's, Cloudflare's computers? It shouldn't be hard to understand.
One more on this, if crypto really becomes a currency it forces people to be more dependent on computers. Those with less interested or skilled in computers (which isn't a fault because we don't need computers to live), or old-computer users would be forced in disadvantage, and they will be poor. Those like Google will still be on top. Nothing changes. Let's be honest, our wealth and power is already determined when we are born. Crypto at best doesn't change anything.
>Not necessarily.
>You can keep most crypto's offline in desktop wallets (only the smart contract ones actually require internet, and smart contracts are a scam anyway).
>You'll need the internet to make transactions and sync up with the blockchains however.
Then is it not a requirement? If you don't use the internet you can never trade.
>If you view it as a stock, then yes it's very unstable.
>If you view it as a currency, not as much.
>There are dumbfucks who keep their crypto's on exchanges, and these people are usually the ones who go like "wut? My crypto's are all gone, CRYPTO IS A SCAM!!".
>Meanwhile, they get reminded so many times to take these off exchanges, if they'd do that the general image would have been way different.
Yes that's what I said it's a network effect. But like if only you and me use the crypto it's meaningless, unless you only want to trade with me, idk.