And McCairn was connected to Hirschman by Greg Harrison, whose team presented a laboratory analysis of the clots last year (even though I think their analysis was fake). Tom Haviland said that Harrison was the "lead scientist" of the team that was analyzing the clots, and that Greg asked Hirschman to send the clots to McCairn, and that Greg asked McCairn to look for prions in the clots: https://laurakasner.substack.com/p/a-horrifying-breakthrough-in-the. Greg tries to pass off AI-hallucinated nonsense like this as discoveries he made in secret Chinese and Soviet documents: https://x.com/Greg21143362/status/1888539927929037124.
These are screenshots of his document titled "Chinese_Dialect_ORF_Maps_ALL-comparisons_9_1_25.doc", which says that the reason why the text in the images is garbled is because it's written in a secret bioweaponeer code, so that for example "Hetnody Ane Uadeeanchounsylnfrtn" is code for "Cytokine-Anchored Systemic Inflammation".
The same document also said that the calamari clots are made of amyloid fibrin produced by his mystery ORFs. For example it said: "ORF19 is heavily implicated in beta-sheet oligomer stacking, a hallmark of prion diseases and amyloid-like deposits."
The real ORF19 was the long reverse ORF in McKernan's Pfizer plasmid sequence. But Greg says that ORF19 is an ORF of the virus and not the vaccine, and that he discovered it in "research logs from 1999 to 2005".
The people in Substack comments were wrong. If I copy text generated by an LLM, then I usually indicate it's something an LLM said. People in Substack comments are so stupid that they think if someone writes a post that is longer than 100 characters and that is not full of grammatical errors, then they must be an AI.
Then McCairn replied: "You're looking at a summary, generated off the article, that some one who I trust to review the document said it needed, the LLM output was better and more concise than my attempt, which leans towards a more verbose style. Hence leaving the markdown in for transparency."
But his post didn't say anywhere that it was generated by AI. It would've been more transparent to just write that it was an AI summary instead of "leaving the Markdown in for transparency". McCairn later edited the post to remove the Markdown bold formatting, but he still didn't mention anywhere that it was an AI summary.
Seem to remember this account as being an alter ego of Kevin McCairn. Used to be quite active on susstack where it got complaints from other people that he was mostly just copying and pasting stuff taken from a LLM-based fake AI.