In my personal opinion, there are many things I can criticize about the Server Side Public License ( #SSPLv1 ) license (which is a source code license that some might confuse with a Free and #OpenSource ( #FOSS ) license due to being a modified version of a GNU Public License ( #GPL )).
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Matt "msw" Wilson (msw@mstdn.social)'s status on Thursday, 17-Nov-2022 00:36:36 JST Matt "msw" Wilson
-
Embed this notice
Dr. Matt Lee ?:verified: (mattl@social.mat.tl)'s status on Thursday, 17-Nov-2022 00:41:08 JST Dr. Matt Lee ?:verified:
@msw it’s a modified version of GPL or AGPL?
-
Embed this notice
Dr. Matt Lee ?:verified: (mattl@social.mat.tl)'s status on Thursday, 17-Nov-2022 01:04:30 JST Dr. Matt Lee ?:verified:
@msw @Foxboron “GNU Public License” is misleading/confusing. You could say GNU licenses maybe?
-
Embed this notice
Matt "msw" Wilson (msw@mstdn.social)'s status on Thursday, 17-Nov-2022 01:04:31 JST Matt "msw" Wilson
@Foxboron @mattl I classify all GNU Public Licenses as part of the family (GPLv2, LGPLv2.1, GPLv3, LGPLv3, AGPLv3 ...)
-
Embed this notice
Morten Linderud (foxboron@chaos.social)'s status on Thursday, 17-Nov-2022 01:04:32 JST Morten Linderud
-
Embed this notice
Dr. Matt Lee ?:verified: (mattl@social.mat.tl)'s status on Thursday, 17-Nov-2022 01:10:11 JST Dr. Matt Lee ?:verified:
@msw @Foxboron yeah because GPL doesn’t mean GNU Public License :/
-
Embed this notice
Matt "msw" Wilson (msw@mstdn.social)'s status on Thursday, 17-Nov-2022 01:10:12 JST Matt "msw" Wilson
@mattl @Foxboron I wrote "a GNU Public License" not "the GNU Public License" intentionally, but I can see why that might be confusing to a reader.
-
Embed this notice