Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   mark (atleagle@mastodon.online)'s status on Saturday, 28-Jun-2025 01:52:55 JST mark

   in reply to

   • AnarchoNinaWrites

   @AnarchoNinaWrites there was an idea floated a while back that would require a bond paid to bring a suit to court. I see nothing to stop this from happening now. Not only do you have to have a lawyer, but they will be charging a cover as well.

   • Embed this notice
     AnarchoNinaWrites (anarchoninawrites@jorts.horse)'s status on Saturday, 28-Jun-2025 01:52:56 JST AnarchoNinaWrites

     in reply to

     SCOTUS is saying "even when Trump loses in lower courts because he's BLATANTLY BREAKING THE LAW judges can't block him from doing it to anyone who isn't also suing."

     Do you understand what that means?

     It means there is no fucking Constitution for you unless you can afford a lawyer who can sue the government.

     America is fucking over man. That's not a joke. Roberts just murdered the last plank that was stopping Trump. We're here. Time to figure out if you can be a "Good German."

   • Embed this notice
     AnarchoNinaWrites (anarchoninawrites@jorts.horse)'s status on Saturday, 28-Jun-2025 01:52:57 JST AnarchoNinaWrites

     Lol, all these shitlibs writing "but it's not so bad, because at least they didn't end birthright citizenship."

     Do not listen to these people; this is bad. This is the end of American courts being able to contain the government unless John Roberts says so. This is going to go so far beyond birthright citizenship it will make your head spin.