Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: (lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Jun-2025 21:33:25 JST Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:

   in reply to

   • Stéphane Bortzmeyer
   • RootWyrm 🇺🇦:progress:
   @rootwyrm @bortzmeyer The year is 20XX, I want to install non-lockable cat doors at every politicians house front door and label it "backdoor for the cat"
   • Embed this notice
     RootWyrm 🇺🇦:progress: (rootwyrm@weird.autos)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Jun-2025 21:33:27 JST RootWyrm 🇺🇦:progress:

     in reply to

     • Stéphane Bortzmeyer

     @bortzmeyer the year is 1997. I am explaining why there is no such thing as a 'safe' backdoor.

     The year is 2001. I am explaining why there is no such thing as a 'safe' backdoor.

     The year is 2007. I am explaining why there is no such thing as a 'safe' backdoor.

     The year is 2011. I am explaining why there is no such thing as a 'safe' backdoor.

     The year is 2016. I am explaining why there is no such thing as a 'safe' backdoor.

     The year is 2025. I really want to just chug bleach now.

   • Embed this notice
     Stéphane Bortzmeyer (bortzmeyer@mastodon.gougere.fr)'s status on Tuesday, 17-Jun-2025 21:33:28 JST Stéphane Bortzmeyer

     Good explanation of why breaking encryption so that the government can read messages is a bad idea. But the fact that you have to explain it again and again is depressing. https://labs.ripe.net/author/flindeberg/end-to-end-encryption-architecturally-necessary/