"confident but wrong" is a very reviewer 2 vibe, so we should not be surprised in the rise of llm use in reviewing paper submissions
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Andy Wingo (wingo@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 16-Jun-2025 21:50:33 JST Andy Wingo
- Christine Lemmer-Webber repeated this.
-
Embed this notice
Andy Wingo (wingo@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 16-Jun-2025 21:51:00 JST Andy Wingo
i guess people are already doing this but i suppose best practice is to submit your own papers to the AI gods and ask what is wrong with them, because that is what reviewer 2 will do anyway; "missing the point as a service"