israel is like the bully in the schoolyard who is constantly being saved by his father.
matt walsh: "israel is its own country and perfectly capable of taking care of itself."
israel is like the bully in the schoolyard who is constantly being saved by his father.
matt walsh: "israel is its own country and perfectly capable of taking care of itself."
you don't need to listen to the dude that is constantly right and gets banned from everything for it?
do you know a better political commentator than nick fuentes?
"you were in high school at the time."
why you mad bro?
how about you answer my question, faggot?
"do you know a better political commentator than nick fuentes?"
what is "TRS"?
do you agree that you have to have people listening to you if you want to call yourself a effective political commentator?
"just because people listen to you doesn't make you necessarily an effective or good commentator."
can you be a good commentator is nobody knows you?
my earlier question was:
"do you know a better political commentator than nick fuentes?"
5 out of the 6 names you gave me seem to be absolutely no names.
Mcnabb
Warren Balogh
Striker
Borzoi
Michael Tracy
the only person with a reasonable audience seems to be Devon Stack.
yes she is actually a better political commentator than fuentes..but for the left.
"you seem to conflate being a popular internet celebrity with being an effective commentator."
do you agree that moving the overton window to your faction is a very big part of beeing a good political commentator?
"the only time Fuentes ever had a shot at moving the overton window was when he went to Amren in 2017[..]Since then he's just gotten more gay and more cringe[..]he's a weird, deviant, crypto homosexual sex pest."
and he is more successfull than ever before?
the groyper army is bigger than ever?
and everything the timesofisrael was worried about happened?
https://mastodon.satoshishop.de/@mk/114688479166505702
i never read it.
what is a 'non sequitur'?
a statement or conclusion that does not logically follow from the previous argument or statement.
you seem to do this a lot..
i asked you multiple yes or no questions and you answer with a whole lot of bullshit that has nothing to do with the argument.
who cares about some dude that doesn't even have a position on israel or anything remotely brand-risky...
yes..you can have a lot of viewers when you don't anger the jews...
what does that have to do with who is the best right-wing political commentator?
this guy is not moving the overton window one bit !
"Adopts White Nationalist talking points in 2025"
december 2019 - timesofisrael
https://mastodon.satoshishop.de/@mk/114688479166505702
why would i give a shit about anything you say? you just gishgallop a bunch of garbage and don't source anything you say.
"Nick Fuentes calls himself Hitler" ?
did he mean that? or was it just a joke?
how about you give me that statement WITH context and we can see how jewish you're argument becomes.
ok fine. view counts don't mean anything, because everything is fake..
but here's a fact you can not deny.
YOU yourself know who nick fuentes is.
i know NONE of the six dudes you mentioned.
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.