I could not agree more, it would end all Israeli hostilities.
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
Ambassador Plebeian A∴A∴☑️ ☑️ (electronwarrior@noauthority.social)'s status on Saturday, 14-Jun-2025 14:54:11 JST Ambassador Plebeian A∴A∴☑️ ☑️
- djsumdog likes this.
-
Embed this notice
WakWak (wakwak@noauthority.social)'s status on Saturday, 14-Jun-2025 14:54:13 JST WakWak
Trump:
“[US personnel in the Middle East] are being moved out....We have given notice to move out....They [Iran] cannot have a nuclear weapon. They cannot have a nuclear weapon. We're not going to allow that.”
-
Embed this notice
WakWak (wakwak@noauthority.social)'s status on Saturday, 14-Jun-2025 14:54:13 JST WakWak
Professor Mearsheimer:
“There is no question that a nuclear-armed Iran would bring stability to the region because nuclear weapons....are weapons of deterrence. If Iran had a nuclear deterrent, there's no way that the United States or Israel would be threatening to attack Iran in the same way that if Iraq and Libya had nuclear weapons, the United States would not have gone to war against Iraq and Libya..”
-
Embed this notice
WakWak (wakwak@noauthority.social)'s status on Saturday, 14-Jun-2025 14:54:14 JST WakWak
Trump:
“I'm getting less confident about [making a deal with Iran]....Something happened to them....Maybe they don't want to make a deal. If they don't make a deal, they're not going to have a nuclear weapon. If they do make a deal, they're not going to have a nuclear weapon too. But you know they're not going to have a nuclear weapon so it's not going to matter....but it would be nicer to do it without warfare, without people dying”