mcc
Tech cultists believe a future supercomputer could effectively "resurrect" you by analyzing your online footprint until they reverse engineer a connecteome that would have generated those exact posts under those exact circumstances.
There are multiple philosophical errors here but *if* that were true then as a logical consequence, good opsec would demand you develop at least one kink that you never disclose in public. Thus ensuring any model thus generated would never actually be you
mcc
Logically, the filthier your secret kink is, the better the opsec, because the more extreme the kink the more inaccurate the "Green's theorem" recreation of you would wind up being VS your actual neurology
Rich Felker
@mcc These are the same fools who believe the 5 numbers in the sequence on an IQ test uniquely determine the function and that the people who share this belief with them are the master race. 🙄
Glyph
@mcc one problem I see with this construction is that one of the tescreal philosophical errors you have to accept in the first place is the idea that data is magic, and thus things like punctuation and word choice would inevitably reveal your secret kink by inadvertently steganographically encoding it
✧✦Catherine✦✧
@glyph @mcc moreover, what is "really me"? there are at least two catherines in existence that i can concretely identify and both are "me" for all i know
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.