Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   :afire: palingenetic man :afire: (anonaccount@poa.st)'s status on Wednesday, 07-May-2025 12:58:03 JST :afire: palingenetic man :afire:
   https://www.amren.com/news/2025/05/appeals-court-denies-trump-request-to-revoke-400000-migrants-legal-status/
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Wednesday, 07-May-2025 12:58:03 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to
     I think there's a simple solution, and it's to get the plaintiff's bar to do the work for the anti-immigration crowd.
     
     Basically, you pass a federal law allowing the federal government to be sued for injuries people sustain from non-individually, case-by-case, vetted immigrants (negligent admission). The law would also allow the administrators to be held directly liable too, and not indemnified by the United States. The damages would be non-dischargeable in bankruptcy.
     
     See the problem is that when immigration is restricted, there's always someone with standing to make a legal claim. When it's expanded, there isn't. So it's a one way ratchet. Creating a statutory cause in the other direction creates the necessary balance to fight the leftist administrations in the courts.
   • Embed this notice
     fireandforget (fireandforget@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Wednesday, 07-May-2025 13:08:19 JST fireandforget

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     Hmmm. That's pretty clever
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? likes this.