Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Wednesday, 07-May-2025 01:43:57 JST silverpill

   in reply to

   • Dewoo Alt-dog
   • Râu Cao ⚡

   @raucao @dwaltiz The team is currently working on this:

   https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4767

   The last couple of weeks have been more productive than usual, according to the commit history.

   They also have a roadmap:

   https://codeberg.org/forgejo-contrib/federation/src/branch/main/FederationRoadmap.md

   • Embed this notice
     Râu Cao ⚡ (raucao@kosmos.social)'s status on Wednesday, 07-May-2025 01:43:59 JST Râu Cao ⚡

     in reply to

     • Dewoo Alt-dog

     @dwaltiz So Forgejo, and thus Codeberg, federate something useful now?

     I've only seen a single update, which is a broken implementation of federated stars, that doesn't let me star a remote repo, but only syncs the centralized stars elsewhere.

   • Embed this notice
     Dewoo Alt-dog (dwaltiz@pleroma.soykaf.com)'s status on Wednesday, 07-May-2025 01:44:00 JST Dewoo Alt-dog

     in reply to

     • Râu Cao ⚡
     @raucao Forgejo is a thing
   • Embed this notice
     Râu Cao ⚡ (raucao@kosmos.social)'s status on Wednesday, 07-May-2025 01:44:01 JST Râu Cao ⚡

     I still can't wrap my mind around the fact that Meta federates Threads now, but there's not a single federated Git hosting/collab implementation in actual use today.

     How is this not a main priority for any software that competes with GitHub?