Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   pyrrhlin (pyrrhlin@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 20-Apr-2025 14:52:03 JST pyrrhlin

   • Daniel J. Bernstein

   @djb what is the justification given for not posting? Is it technical or too long to share?

   • Embed this notice
     Daniel J. Bernstein (djb@mastodon.cr.yp.to)'s status on Sunday, 20-Apr-2025 14:52:02 JST Daniel J. Bernstein

     in reply to

     @Pyrrhlin Specifically, they claimed that they "require (human) author names" rather than an "organization". But organizations are listed as authors of documents all the time (e.g.: https://web.archive.org/web/20250309024856/https://iacr.org/petitions/gaza_war.html); previous cryptographic research papers from organizations have appeared on eprint (e.g.: https://web.archive.org/web/20250130053518/https://eprint.iacr.org/2022/087.pdf); and published eprint policy says "any author" (https://web.archive.org/web/20240413134704/https://iacr.org/eprint/). It's clear that IACR's actual goal here is to suppress this particular new report, not to be consistent.

     Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     pyrrhlin (pyrrhlin@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 20-Apr-2025 14:52:03 JST pyrrhlin

     in reply to

     • Daniel J. Bernstein

     @djb oh, probably “submissions must not be anonymous and state title, author name(s), and a contact address or affiliation(s) on the first page”