Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Arkana (arkana@poa.st)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 18:41:38 JST Arkana
   Human beings have "breeds" in the same way that any other animal does. A cow is bred to make milk, a sheep is bred to make wool, and dogs are bred for many purposes. To herd sheep, act on guard, kill rats, etc. Groups of people have the same biological inclinations, to which kind of living they are most suited towards.
   
   That is why mixing races can cause harm, especially when the two parents are genetically very distant. You are trying to combine two animals that are suited to two very different environments. The child will be forced to contend with this mixed biological messaging, and may become confused and frustrated at their own desires and needs.
   They will be separate biologically when it comes to medical compatibility, and culturally when it comes to preferences. They end up alone and isolated, and ultimately are forced to either try and assimilate into one of their parents cultures or live as outcasts.
   
   At its core is that it is very risky to do. You are putting a lot of pressure on the child, which has zero guarantee will result in any positives and many highly likely negatives. This can be simply avoided by having children that are more genetically, culturally, compatible between both parents.
   • Hoss Delgado likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Hoss Delgado (hoss@shitpost.cloud)'s status on Friday, 18-Apr-2025 18:43:52 JST Hoss Delgado

     in reply to

     The only thing I disagree with here is that disparate human populations are "breeds" which is typically used for intentionally bred populations to emphasize specific traits. Subspecies is a more accurate terminology which is already widely used in the study of biology for everything but Homo Sapiens because it's too heckin' problematic.