GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Matthew Garrett (mjg59@nondeterministic.computer)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Mar-2025 12:11:06 JST Matthew Garrett Matthew Garrett

    I'm a huge proponent of copyleft licensing, I'm in favour of using the GPL as a tool to ensure users have the ability to modify the software on their devices, and I'm just having trouble getting too worked up about the Rust reimplementation of Coreutils being MIT. Philosophically? Yeah, it sucks. Practical outcomes? Almost certainly none. The GPL violators aren't going to change coreutils implementation to avoid being sued, the FSF wasn't going to do that anyway

    In conversation about 3 months ago from nondeterministic.computer permalink
    • prettygood likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Matthew Garrett (mjg59@nondeterministic.computer)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Mar-2025 12:16:50 JST Matthew Garrett Matthew Garrett
      in reply to

      What Coreutils-adjacent GPL enforcement there has been centred around Busybox, a GPLed implementation of many POSIX and Unixish tools, commonly used in embedded devices. Busybox-related enforcement has been an effective tool in obtaining compliance, to the extent that it's been reimplemented under a permissive licence with the explicit goal of reducing enforcement risk. Coreutils has simply never been subject to enforcement in the same way, so there's no significant impact.

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
      prettygood likes this.
      Dr. Matt Lee is at hireme.fyi repeated this.
    • Embed this notice
      Matthew Garrett (mjg59@nondeterministic.computer)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Mar-2025 12:22:21 JST Matthew Garrett Matthew Garrett
      in reply to

      Nobody is going to try to make money on a proprietary fork of an MIT Coreutils. Nobody is hiding their trade secrets there. This isn't the 80s.

      What is a bigger issue is the more symbolic nature of things. People had the opportunity to pick a copyleft licence and chose not to. We can view this as an attack on copyleft (albeit one that's likely symbolic at best), or we can accept that the copyleft community has been doing a poor job winning the hearts and minds of new generations of developers

      In conversation about 3 months ago permalink
      prettygood likes this.

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.