Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Paul Cantrell (inthehands@hachyderm.io)'s status on Friday, 14-Mar-2025 02:05:26 JST Paul Cantrell

   OpenAI says outright that their entire business model depends on throwing copyright out the window.

   “Fair use for me, but not for thee.”

   https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/03/openai-urges-trump-either-settle-ai-copyright-debate-or-lose-ai-race-to-china/

   • Embed this notice
     Ben Ford :grinchsmile: (binford2k@hachyderm.io)'s status on Friday, 14-Mar-2025 02:18:02 JST Ben Ford :grinchsmile:

     in reply to

     @inthehands ok. Let it be over then.

   • Embed this notice
     Donald Ball (donaldball@triangletoot.party)'s status on Friday, 14-Mar-2025 04:17:54 JST Donald Ball

     in reply to

     @inthehands If the four factors test still applies in practice (lol, lmfao), I’ll grant them transformative, but on each of the other three, the ML argument fails as completely as it is possible to fail, imho.

   • Embed this notice
     Paul Cantrell (inthehands@hachyderm.io)'s status on Friday, 14-Mar-2025 04:27:44 JST Paul Cantrell

     in reply to

     • Donald Ball

     @donaldball
     Indeed. I would even argue that if they want to argue that it •doesn’t• fail the “impact on potential market” test, that’s an admission that their entire product pitch is BS. Either AI can replace the humans who do this work or it can’t; you can’t have that cake and eat it too.