Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Saturday, 08-Mar-2025 21:51:43 JST 翠星石
   ED IS THE TRUE PATH TO NIRVANA! ED HAS BEEN THE CHOICE OF EDUCATED AND IGNORANT ALIKE FOR CENTURIES! ED WILL NOT CORRUPT YOUR PRECIOUS BODILY FLUIDS!! ED IS THE STANDARD TEXT EDITOR! ED MAKES THE SUN SHINE AND THE BIRDS SING AND THE GRASS GREEN!!
   
   But only GNU ed.
   • Embed this notice
     Anthk (anthk@paquita.masto.host)'s status on Saturday, 08-Mar-2025 21:52:46 JST Anthk

     in reply to

     @Suiseiseki na, openbsd ed from ibara at gh.
     Altough I prefer Sam.

   • Embed this notice
     翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Saturday, 08-Mar-2025 22:15:57 JST 翠星石

     in reply to

     • Anthk
     @anthk Of course you would use a version of ed that's proprietary actually proprietary.
   • Embed this notice
     Anthk (anthk@paquita.masto.host)'s status on Saturday, 08-Mar-2025 22:18:25 JST Anthk

     in reply to

     @Suiseiseki not propietary, isc.

   • Embed this notice
     翠星石 (suiseiseki@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Saturday, 08-Mar-2025 22:47:55 JST 翠星石

     in reply to

     • Anthk
     @anthk BSD developers don't actually bother to ensure that the software is free. Often it's the case that they're able to license some files under ISC and other under 3-clause BSD, but they have no permission to license some other files and they leave those files unlicensed, rather than replace them.
   • Embed this notice
     Anthk (anthk@paquita.masto.host)'s status on Saturday, 08-Mar-2025 22:52:00 JST Anthk

     in reply to

     @Suiseiseki I know, but there's hyperbola

   • Embed this notice
     GNU/Gabi (gabi@freesoftwareextremist.com)'s status on Sunday, 09-Mar-2025 15:17:54 JST GNU/Gabi

     in reply to
     @Suiseiseki
     The Church of ED is fine as long as they glorify a free ED and impose penance on the use of a proprietary ED.
     翠星石 likes this.