Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   UnCL3 (uncl3@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Saturday, 08-Mar-2025 14:25:51 JST UnCL3
   https://whdh.com/news/7-investigates-ma-woman-buys-a-home-but-courts-say-she-cant-live-in-it/?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter_7News
   Any of you fuckers live in MA? Good luck if you own property, because it does not appear to be too difficult for someone to legally steal it from you. How would all y'all like to be deezgustedz?
   Read on.
   • Embed this notice
     UnCL3 (uncl3@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Saturday, 08-Mar-2025 14:25:48 JST UnCL3

     in reply to

     • WilhelmIII
     that's why you go Federal. RN seems like a good time to do it.
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Saturday, 08-Mar-2025 14:25:48 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • WilhelmIII
     Their mistake was showing up to court. They should have let it defaulted and then sued in unlawful detainer. There could have been defects, etc, on the pleadings that are waived by appearance, so why waive it it's a loser anyway? People are so fucking impatient. They think they're going to run in and tell the judge they're story, and he's just going to agree. It's a game, and a long one at that. Going to court is not always the answer.
   • Embed this notice
     WilhelmIII (wilhelmiii@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Saturday, 08-Mar-2025 14:25:49 JST WilhelmIII

     in reply to

     I'm sure Assachutesettes doesn't care.

   • Embed this notice
     UnCL3 (uncl3@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Saturday, 08-Mar-2025 14:25:50 JST UnCL3

     in reply to
     If I was this lady I'd look into suing the city, state, and the squatter for violating her civil rights. Surely this is a flawed law that can result in an outcome like this.
   • Embed this notice
     UnCL3 (uncl3@nicecrew.digital)'s status on Saturday, 08-Mar-2025 15:29:49 JST UnCL3

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • WilhelmIII
     ultimately it should be illegal to deceive someone in a business deal (the bank)...seems like this here is an effective lien that should PREVENT the sale of the property until this cunt was removed. I mean come on.
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Saturday, 08-Mar-2025 15:29:49 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • WilhelmIII
     A seller in foreclosure may not know your condition of your property. It's actually largely up to the buyer to protect themselves. This is also true in probate sales. In both cases, the price is often discounted. Caveat emptor. I wouldn't buy a distress property if you don't know what you're getting into. They probably thought they were getting a steal by acting as the banks proxy, which is really that they were — they thought they were assisting the bank in unloading the property, and getting a deal for helping the jew. So I don't feel too bad for them.
   • Embed this notice
     ?? Humpleupagus ?? (humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club)'s status on Saturday, 08-Mar-2025 15:31:37 JST ?? Humpleupagus ??

     in reply to

     • ?? Humpleupagus ??
     • WilhelmIII
     To put it another way... when you deal with a jew, expect to get screwed.