Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Blurry Moon (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Saturday, 22-Feb-2025 02:37:20 JST Blurry Moon

   • Jerome
   • Vokainen
   @vokainen099 @j yeah I am saying, seeding is what got you caught. Meta is saying they didn't seed (or not much). but they are releasing a model based on that data so obviously they are still infringing even if they didn't seed
   • Embed this notice
     lainy (lain@lain.com)'s status on Saturday, 22-Feb-2025 02:43:02 JST lainy

     in reply to

     • Jerome
     • Vokainen
     @sun @vokainen099 @j it’s not obvious in a legal sense, the output of a training session isn’t copyrightable (because it’s the output of an algorithm) so using copyrighted material as input might not be a copyright violation in itself. (This is the angels on a pin stuff that IP law leads to)
     Blurry Moon likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Blurry Moon (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Saturday, 22-Feb-2025 02:43:57 JST Blurry Moon

     in reply to

     • lainy
     • Jerome
     • Vokainen
     @lain @vokainen099 @j that's fair, that is downstream of the terrible seeding argument though. They're lawyers though, obv they are going to try any argument they can
     lainy likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Jerome (j@shitposter.world)'s status on Saturday, 22-Feb-2025 03:08:35 JST Jerome

     in reply to

     • Vokainen
     @vokainen099 @sun if that's what's going to happen then the world really is healing. But man seeding is illegal? Imagine going to prison because you seeded a torrent to Facebook. You broke the law but they didn't. Holy shit that's dystopian.
     Blurry Moon likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     Vokainen (vokainen099@cawfee.club)'s status on Saturday, 22-Feb-2025 03:08:36 JST Vokainen

     in reply to

     • Jerome
     @sun @j Would be funny to see corpos demolishing the same copyright laws they lobbied for just because they want to push AI now