GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    Matt Blaze (mattblaze@federate.social)'s status on Tuesday, 11-Feb-2025 03:57:22 JST Matt Blaze Matt Blaze

    A reminder that "executive orders" are exactly that - orders from the president for the executive branch. They are not laws, and they do not directly bind anyone not in the executive branch of the US government. They might affect how laws are enforced and other things the executive branch does that affect private individuals, but they are not "orders" that private individuals (or organizations) are required to obey.

    In conversation about 4 months ago from federate.social permalink
    • James Morris likes this.
    • Embed this notice
      Rich Felker (dalias@hachyderm.io)'s status on Tuesday, 11-Feb-2025 07:16:02 JST Rich Felker Rich Felker
      in reply to
      • 0ddj0bb Is At Cyphercon

      @0ddj0bb @mattblaze The order doesn't apply to them. It might mean contracts don't get renewed, but if the contracted company tries to apply rules that break the law (e.g. discriminatory or unsafe shit) to their employees just to keep their contracts, they're breaking the law and employees need not comply, and have grounds to sue when fired.

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      0ddj0bb Is At Cyphercon (0ddj0bb@infosec.exchange)'s status on Tuesday, 11-Feb-2025 07:16:03 JST 0ddj0bb Is At Cyphercon 0ddj0bb Is At Cyphercon
      in reply to

      @mattblaze as well as potentially all federal contractors. So pretty much all big tech, consulting, finance, hr etc. It would be a nontrivial order that would impact millions

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Matt Blaze (mattblaze@federate.social)'s status on Tuesday, 11-Feb-2025 07:16:04 JST Matt Blaze Matt Blaze
      in reply to

      So… if the president issued an executive order that underwear must from now on be worn on the outside of clothing, that might require federal employees to change how they dress for work. But the rest of us would remain free in our sartorial choices.

      (It would also be really weird, and suggest the president was drawing undue inspiration from fictional Latin American dictators, possibly implicating the 25th Amendment)

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink
    • Embed this notice
      Matt Blaze (mattblaze@federate.social)'s status on Tuesday, 11-Feb-2025 07:16:05 JST Matt Blaze Matt Blaze
      in reply to

      Ditto "commander-in-chief". The president is the "commander-in-chief" of the MILITARY and at the top of its chain of command. Those outside of the military are not part of the chain of command.

      In conversation about 4 months ago permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.