This is the paradox: The more we try to measure everything, the more we miss what matters.
Choose to be measured by the impact you create, not just the data you collect.
This is the paradox: The more we try to measure everything, the more we miss what matters.
Choose to be measured by the impact you create, not just the data you collect.
@portugeek @Daojoan Something from @pluralistic I'm always quoting:
"Quantitative disciplines – physics, math, and (especially) computer science – make a pretense of objectivity. They make very precise measurements of everything that can be measured precisely, assign deceptively precise measurements to things that can’t be measured precisely, and jettison the rest on the grounds that you can’t do mathematical operations on it."
@Daojoan Until recently I was working for a massive European institution that was rolling out a new way to “measure” our work. Basically everything had to be a project, so everyone’s work can be quantified within PM tools. It doesn’t matter what the actual contribution of the individual is, if there isn’t a metric for it within a project, it wasn’t valuable. Even regular maintenance work had to be shoehorned into projects just in case upper management thought it useless and discarded it.
This quantify everything trend is happening everywhere for every department. If it’s not measurable, it’s not important. If you can only see your organisation’s work via a spreadsheet, you don’t know diddly squat about it and the work it does. These people want to know the cost of everything, because they can’t understand the value of anything.
GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.