Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Philip Weiss (Phil in SF) (kingrat@sfba.social)'s status on Sunday, 09-Feb-2025 08:09:01 JST Philip Weiss (Phil in SF)

   in reply to

   • In vain

   @coreyf The order requires them to delete the data they downloaded.

   • Embed this notice
     In vain (coreyf@sfba.social)'s status on Sunday, 09-Feb-2025 08:09:02 JST In vain

     I find it hard to believe that a judge’s order preventing DOGE from having anything to do with Treasury systems *now* will be effective. They’ve probably done what they needed to—created a way into the systems, and downloaded the data.

   • Embed this notice
     Philip Weiss (Phil in SF) (kingrat@sfba.social)'s status on Sunday, 09-Feb-2025 09:01:20 JST Philip Weiss (Phil in SF)

     • In vain

     @coreyf There isn't a built-in enforcement mechanism on this order. However, the plaintiffs can come back with a contempt motion if they think the order is violated.

   • Embed this notice
     Philip Weiss (Phil in SF) (kingrat@sfba.social)'s status on Sunday, 09-Feb-2025 14:32:43 JST Philip Weiss (Phil in SF)

     • In vain

     @coreyf none of those are arms of the court. courts have never had an enforcement arm of their own.