Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Kit Rhett Aultman (roadriverrail@signs.codes)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 00:14:54 JST Kit Rhett Aultman

   "I have a question, well, really, it's three questions. Each question has several parts...*

   • Embed this notice
     I Forget (epilanthanomai@signs.codes)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 01:09:07 JST I Forget

     in reply to

     @roadriverrail "I have a question. I understand either you or your co-presenter always lies. If I were to ask her how your theory addresses the conclusions of Foucault's Crime and Punishment, would she tell me..."

   • Embed this notice
     Kit Rhett Aultman (roadriverrail@signs.codes)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 01:33:32 JST Kit Rhett Aultman

     in reply to

     • I Forget

     @epilanthanomai You do know about my "first person to reference Foucault wins" rule, yes?

   • Embed this notice
     I Forget (epilanthanomai@signs.codes)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 01:47:09 JST I Forget

     in reply to

     @roadriverrail I do not!

   • Embed this notice
     Kit Rhett Aultman (roadriverrail@signs.codes)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 01:53:34 JST Kit Rhett Aultman

     in reply to

     • I Forget

     @epilanthanomai guess you do now! First one to tie in Foucault wins. In the event multiple presenters mention Foucault in their presentation, the fewest number of words before Foucault wins. You may shave 10 words off your rating if you can say "empire" as the last word in the sentence after you name-drop Foucault. Should language become excessively forced to the point that it's evident someone gamed these rules, a disqualification may be issued.