Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Rich Felker (dalias@hachyderm.io)'s status on Monday, 27-Jan-2025 00:37:17 JST Rich Felker

   • Only Ohm

   @only_ohm This is a common AI fan fallacy, and yes we are quite sure of that.

   The topic is somewhat too large for a toot, but the important ingredients are ability to experiment on physical world and develop a model based on results of that, consequences (which is how the above impacts survival or future capabilities), concepts that are not modelable as patterns of language tokens, etc.

   • Embed this notice
     Rich Felker (dalias@hachyderm.io)'s status on Monday, 27-Jan-2025 00:42:15 JST Rich Felker

     in reply to

     • Only Ohm

     @only_ohm The sense in which humans know water turns to ice when it gets cold (and find exceptions to that knowledge) is from being able to observe and test aspects of that, not from stuffing their brains with billions of random-provenance slop claiming it's true.

   • Embed this notice
     Alexandre Oliva (moving to @lxo@snac.lx.oliva.nom.br) (lxo@gnusocial.jp)'s status on Monday, 27-Jan-2025 05:48:46 JST Alexandre Oliva (moving to @lxo@snac.lx.oliva.nom.br)

     in reply to
     there's some contrast between learning through the scientific method or from sacred scriptures to be underlined in what you wrote