Some people are pointing out that the dei executives in the federal government aren't being fired but are instead being given different roles. Now absolutely that could mean someone in the federal government is being sneaky and they are going to continue on their work with the dei, but it is also entirely possible that they put competent managers into at least some of those positions and with that particular mandate completed the organization doesn't want to lose a competent manager.

I know some people who has been perfectly decent people in some very stupid positions over the years. They are able to get things done, but the thing they are trying to get done is stupid. In that case, it's a net positive not losing that management, you can put them towards something productive like making sure they actually get their purpose as an organization done.

Of course, I don't want to disregard the idea that some of these institutions just are hanging on to dead wood. We've seen some dei managers and they won't be contributing positively to any organization they are a part of. Some of those people who have retained employment even though the reason that they were hired has disappeared probably should find themselves laid off as their position is mad redundant.