Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Phantasm (phnt@fluffytail.org)'s status on Thursday, 23-Jan-2025 02:19:58 JST Phantasm

   in reply to

   • :blobcatflower:
   • twinspin
   • snacks
   • anemone
   @snacks @anemone @lucy @twinspin6 Yeah, you would have to be a lot bigger for it to make sense. Old SPC was on the edge being able to run on a single server. Poast uses multiple DBs and Pleroma instances on standby I think, but that might just be for replication and HA, not for performance reasons.
   • snacks likes this.
   • Embed this notice
     snacks (snacks@netzsphaere.xyz)'s status on Thursday, 23-Jan-2025 02:19:59 JST snacks

     in reply to

     • :blobcatflower:
     • twinspin
     • anemone
     @phnt @anemone @lucy @twinspin6 would also be pointless unless you try to host thousands of users i'd think
   • Embed this notice
     Phantasm (phnt@fluffytail.org)'s status on Thursday, 23-Jan-2025 02:20:00 JST Phantasm

     in reply to

     • :blobcatflower:
     • twinspin
     • snacks
     • anemone
     @lucy @anemone @snacks @twinspin6 feld had it almost working. Theoretically it's possible, but one or two libraries Pleroma uses would have to be replaced. One of which is cachex, if I remember correctly.
   • Embed this notice
     :blobcatflower: (methyltheobromine@netzsphaere.xyz)'s status on Thursday, 23-Jan-2025 02:20:01 JST :blobcatflower:

     • twinspin
     • snacks
     • anemone
     @twinspin6 @anemone @snacks did anyone try to split a pleroma instance across multiple machines yet?
     isn't that one the supposed advantages of beam?