Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   Lorena Jaume-Palasí (lopalasi@dair-community.social)'s status on Saturday, 18-Jan-2025 00:06:51 JST Lorena Jaume-Palasí

   Why do you all think you can regulate the harms and risks of AI with laws that use exactly the same standardization methods and procedures? How come you criticize the thinking behind AI but ignore the thinking behind law?

   • Timnit Gebru (she/her) repeated this.
   • Embed this notice
     Lorena Jaume-Palasí (lopalasi@dair-community.social)'s status on Saturday, 18-Jan-2025 00:07:10 JST Lorena Jaume-Palasí

     in reply to

     The problem with #AI regulation is that it is regulation about AI. Not only because it regulates something as vague as the concept of AI, but also because it again compartmentalizes, diffuses and decontextualizes systemic problems into categories.

     Timnit Gebru (she/her) repeated this.
   • Embed this notice
     Lorena Jaume-Palasí (lopalasi@dair-community.social)'s status on Saturday, 18-Jan-2025 00:07:29 JST Lorena Jaume-Palasí

     in reply to

     It's no coincidence that we have so different approaches in the law fields of the continental legal culture:speech regulation -a field people in power make regular use of- is a highly contextual, analogy ridden affair, while criminal law is a highly technical, standardized matter