@evan No, but. No, because in several ways, the United States represents a cooptation of the democratic spirit. Until around the mid 19th Cent. 'democracy' was a slur against popular revolts not unlike how 'terrorism' is used today against all sorts of things like climate action, labor strikes etc. The US establishment claimed 'democracy' when they managed to change it to mean voting for a representative. David Graeber told the story in his 2013 book The Democracy Project.
Conversation
Notices
-
Embed this notice
malte (malte@radikal.social)'s status on Tuesday, 14-Jan-2025 08:50:25 JST malte
- kuteboiCoder likes this.
-
Embed this notice
kuteboiCoder (kuteboicoder@subs4social.xyz)'s status on Tuesday, 14-Jan-2025 08:53:20 JST kuteboiCoder
@malte@radikal.social @evan@cosocial.ca
This is unironically true (from a 17th century standpoint). But it's still odd that Jefferson and Madison - anti-Hamiltonians and tradcuck populists both - chose to call their resistance party the Democratic-Republican Party.
They chose to call themselves a slur. #faggotfathers #bvsed -
Embed this notice
kuteboiCoder (kuteboicoder@subs4social.xyz)'s status on Tuesday, 14-Jan-2025 08:58:53 JST kuteboiCoder
@malte@radikal.social @evan@cosocial.ca
It wasn't until the Jacksonian era that the word "democracy" was unequivocally good and fully linked with Americanism in official policymaking circles.
That's when Alexis de Tocquville wrote his magnum opus, "The American Republic" - later published under the title "Democracy in America". -
Embed this notice
M. Grégoire (mpjgregoire@cosocial.ca)'s status on Wednesday, 15-Jan-2025 03:41:46 JST M. Grégoire
@KuteboiCoder @evan @malte
Democracy is not unequivocally good, and the erroneous perception that it is muddles our judgements of state actions.kuteboiCoder likes this.